Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

NON-LINEAR AND DUMMY EFFECTS OF BOARD SIZE ON SHARE PRICE AMONG LISTED FIRMS IN GHANA USING SEEMINGLY UNRELATED REGRESSION

Authors: Ebenezer Nyarko Assabil1 , Richard Kwame Nimako2 , Enoch Kwablah Teye3*;

NON-LINEAR AND DUMMY EFFECTS OF BOARD SIZE ON SHARE PRICE AMONG LISTED FIRMS IN GHANA USING SEEMINGLY UNRELATED REGRESSION

Abstract

Purpose-This study seeks to determine the specific number on a board that gives the highest share value for listed companies in Ghana. Design/methodology/approach- Non-linear and dummies for board size of 7, 8, 9, and 10 were used in seemingly unrelated regression to determine the optimum board size. Listed firms in Ghana were used in a panel data with 144 firm-year observations. Findings- The study reveals that larger board size is positively and significantly associated with firm valuation. Further examinations to check for the presence of non-linear associations reveal statistically significant inverted U-shaped association for board size. The study shows that an “efficient limit” to board size should be nine (9) members. Financial firms are associated with higher level of investor confidence and higher market valuation than non-financial firms and larger board size offers less benefit to investors of financial firms relative to those in the non-financial sector. Practical implications – Investors and firms should appreciate that different board size affect share price differently and the optimum number that should constitute a board in Ghana is nine (9). Originality/value- firm value has been determined using five different measures to determine optimal board size (9).

Related Organizations
Keywords

seemingly unrelated regression, share price, optimum board size

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!