
The principle of public order and good customs, enshrined in Articles 8 and 153 of China's Civil Code, serves as a foundational mechanism to invalidate civil acts that contravene societal morals and public interests. This paper examines its judicial application through analysis of recent court cases from various provinces, highlighting inconsistencies in interpretation and enforcement. Drawing from specific judgments, it identifies issues such as arbitrary citation of principle-based versus rule-based clauses, leading to divergent outcomes in similar disputes. The study proposes normative measures, including Supreme People's Court (SPC)interpretations and case guidance, to enhance uniformity and predictability in adjudication. By addressing these challenges, the principle can better safeguard social harmony while respecting legal certainty.
Public Order and Good Customs, Normative Suggestions, China's Civil Code, Inconsistency, Judicial Application
Public Order and Good Customs, Normative Suggestions, China's Civil Code, Inconsistency, Judicial Application
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
