
This preprint advances the claim that atoms of the same isotope are not strictly identical: differences in nuclear microstructure and history make their decay behavior discretely individual. I revisit Schrödinger’s tiny-sample setup, Einstein’s framing, and the popular single-atom retelling. The first two can be viewed as ensembles—multiples of the third—and the single-atom lens makes the initial-time issue explicit: starting today versus starting tomorrow selects different points along an ongoing, irreversible process; swapping in and out of a box does not reset the process. Hence, the familiar “50% in one hour” probability is personal (i.e., time-dependent)—a modeling choice tied to the chosen t0, not a physically grounded restart condition. I develop a discrete, AI-inspired logic to formalize these points and discuss implications for interpretation, measurement, and practical heuristics (e.g., fusion).
initial condition, Schrödinger's cat, one-atom, machine logic, atomic non-identity, discrete, time dependence, single-atom, radioactive decay, AI logic
initial condition, Schrödinger's cat, one-atom, machine logic, atomic non-identity, discrete, time dependence, single-atom, radioactive decay, AI logic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
