
This study uses OpenAI and Microsoft as case studies to explore corporate responsibility in AI development. It evaluates ethical policies, organizational structures, and compliance mechanisms. The paper identifies gaps in oversight and proposes practical reforms to improve transparency, collaboration, and standardization in AI governance. The analysis is based on publicly available documents, reports, and literature.
AI ethics, regulatory compliance, corporate governance
AI ethics, regulatory compliance, corporate governance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
