Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Software . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Software . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Software . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Supplementary material for "Dual-Layer Gradient-Boosted Equivalent Sources for Magnetic Data"

Authors: Uppal, India; Uieda, Leonardo; Oliveira Jr, Vanderlei; Holme, Richard;

Supplementary material for "Dual-Layer Gradient-Boosted Equivalent Sources for Magnetic Data"

Abstract

This repository contains the data and source code used to produce the results presented in: Uppal, I., Uieda, L., Oliveira Jr., V. C., Holme, R. (2025). Dual-Layer Gradient-Boosted Equivalent Sources for Magnetic Data. Geophysical Journal International. DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggaf359 Abstract Magnetic data often require interpolation onto a regular grid at constant height before further analysis. A widely used approach for this is the equivalent sources technique, which has been adapted over time to improve its computational efficiency and accuracy of the predictions. However, many of these adaptations still face challenges, including border effects in the predictions or reliance on a stabilising parameter. To address these limitations, we introduce dual-layer gradient-boosted equivalent sources to: (1) use a dual-layer approach to improve the predictions of both short- and long-wavelength signals, as well as, reduce border effect; (2) use block-averaging and the gradient-boosted equivalent sources method to reduce the computational load; (3) apply block K-fold cross-validation to guide optimal parameter selection for the model. The proposed method was tested on both synthetic datasets and the ICEGRAV aeromagnetic dataset to evaluate the methods ability to interpolate and upward continue onto a regular grid, as well as predict the amplitude of the anomalous field from total-field anomaly data. The dual-layer approach proved better compared to the single-layer approach when predicting both short- and long-wavelength signals, particularly in the presence of truncated long-wavelength anomalies. The use of block-averaging and the gradient-boosting method enhances the computational efficiency, being able to grid over 400,000 data points in under 2 minutes on a moderate workstation computer. License All Python source code (including .py and .ipynb files) is made available under the MIT license. You can freely use and modify the code, without warranty, so long as you provide attribution to the authors. See LICENSE-MIT.txt for the full license text. The manuscript text (including all LaTeX files), figures, and data/models produced as part of this research are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC-BY). See LICENSE-CC-BY.txt for the full license text.

Keywords

Geophysics, Magnetism, FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences, Geomagnetism

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average