Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

From Snapshots to Standards: Measuring AI Visibility with the AIVO Standard™ and PSOS™ Auditing

Authors: de Rosen, Tim;

From Snapshots to Standards: Measuring AI Visibility with the AIVO Standard™ and PSOS™ Auditing

Abstract

From Snapshots to Standards: Measuring AI Visibility with the AIVO Standard™ and PSOS™ Auditing addresses the emerging challenge of measuring brand presence in AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity. Current visibility tools (e.g., Profound, Evertune, PEEC AI, Semrush, AthenaHQ) rely largely on snapshots — one-off screenshots or share-of-voice counts — which provide directional signals but lack reproducibility, sustainability, and audit integrity. This white paper introduces the AIVO Standard™, a proposed framework for AI Visibility Optimization (AIVO), and its associated Prompt-Space Occupancy Score (PSOS™) auditing system. PSOS provides a structured, repeatable methodology: systematic prompt set design across awareness, consideration, and decision stages; multi-LLM execution with time-stamping, hashing, and optional notarization; top-tier scoring rules with sentiment filters; reproducible benchmarks suitable for governance and competitive comparison. The paper contrasts snapshot and PSOS approaches using stylized case studies in banking, SaaS, and consumer goods. Appendices include a sample dataset, workflow notes, cost estimates, an output record example, and discussion of limitations (e.g., prompt bias, model drift, resource intensity). The contribution is twofold: To demonstrate why snapshots are insufficient for governance, investment, or strategy. To propose PSOS as a repeatable, audit-grade benchmark that could form the basis of future standardization efforts (e.g., ISO, CEN, IEEE). This work will be of interest to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers in AI governance, marketing analytics, and information retrieval.

Keywords

Marketing, LLM, AIVOStandard, InformationRetrieval, AEO, GEO, AIVisibility, SEO, FOS: Economics and business, AI, CMO, AISearch, AIO, AIVO, Enterprise

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average