
Computer vision datasets often exhibit biases in the form of spurious correlations between certain attributes and target variables. While recent efforts aim to mitigate such biases and foster bias-neutral representations, they fail in complex real-world scenarios. In particular, existing methods excel in controlled experiments on benchmarks with single-attribute injected biases, but struggle with complex multi-attribute biases that naturally occur in established CV datasets. In this paper, we introduce BAdd, a simple yet effective method that allows for learning bias-neutral representations invariant to bias-inducing attributes. This is achieved by injecting features encoding these attributes into the training process. BAdd is evaluated on seven benchmarks and exhibits competitive performance, surpassing state-of-the-art methods on both single- and multi-attribute bias settings. Notably, it achieves +27.5% and +5.5% absolute accuracy improvements on the challenging multi-attribute benchmarks, FB-Biased-MNIST and CelebA, respectively.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
