
This article develops a critical and bibliometric review of academic quality and financial health in Chilean higher education, within socio-academic contexts in which current Latin American social problems simultaneously jeopardize equitable access, institutional sustainability, and quality standards. The review covers 63 documents indexed in international databases between 2010 and 2025, systematized under a neutrosophic stance detection methodology. The results highlight the risks of high tuition dependence, the positive effects of income diversification, and the relevance of governance, retention, and faculty profiles for financial and academic sustainability. In addition, demographic decline and increased competition emerge as contextual threats. The study integrates neutrosophic triplets (T, I, F) to quantify the degree of consensus, indeterminacy, and contradiction across the literature. The conclusions of the literature review are coherent and consistent with the results of stance detection, which provides validation and formalization of the patterns that already emerged in the state of the art.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
