Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Assessing the Efficacy of Combining Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Clinical Evaluation

Authors: Hadia sheraz1, Hajira Abid Ranjha2, Muhammad Abdullah3, Amna Mansoor4, Muhammad!Ahmer shoiab5, Anum Syed Tauqir Radhawi6, Haiqa Tahir7, Aisha haq8;

Assessing the Efficacy of Combining Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Clinical Evaluation

Abstract

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents approximately 85% of all lung cancer cases, and most patients present with advanced disease at diagnosis. While chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of treatment, recent advances in immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have significantly improved outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC compared to chemotherapy alone. Methods: A total of 160 patients with stage IIIb or IV NSCLC were enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort study. Participants were divided into two treatment groups: combination therapy (platinum-doublet chemotherapy plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, n=80) and chemotherapy alone (n=80). Primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety profiles. Kaplan–Meier survival curves, Cox proportional hazards models, and logistic regression analyses were used to assess clinical outcomes. Results: The combination therapy group showed a significant improvement in median PFS (9.8 vs. 5.4 months, p < 0.001) and OS (18.1 vs. 11.2 months, p = 0.002) compared to chemotherapy alone. ORR was also higher in the combination group (52.5% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.003). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were more frequent in the combination group but remained manageable. Grade 3–4 toxicities occurred in 28.8% of patients receiving combination therapy versus 21.3% in the chemotherapy group. Conclusion:Combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy significantly improves survival and tumor response rates in patients with advanced NSCLC without unacceptable toxicity. This approach should be considered a frontline standard in eligible patients, pending further long-term evaluation.

Keywords

Non-small cell lung cancer, immunotherapy, chemotherapy, PD-1 inhibitors, combination therapy, progression-free survival

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research