Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Companion Datasets (Study 1 & Study 2): Driving Sustainable Choices—Warning Messages in Car Ads and Their Effects on Attention and Emotions

Authors: Wang, Boyao; Viedma-del-Jesus, Maria I.; Ibañez Zapata, Jose Angel; Montoro-Rios, Francisco J;

Companion Datasets (Study 1 & Study 2): Driving Sustainable Choices—Warning Messages in Car Ads and Their Effects on Attention and Emotions

Abstract

This record contains the two anonymized datasets and accompanying documentation for the article Driving Sustainable Choices: The Impact of Warning Messages in Car Advertisements on Consumer Attention and Emotional Responses. The research examines how message framing (gain vs. loss) and warning format (text vs. image) shape visual attention (eye-tracking) and emotional/evaluative responses (self-reports) in static car advertisements. We provide one dataset per study: Study 1 (between-subjects, lab eye-tracking) — participants were randomly assigned to a gain-framed or loss-framed ad. Primary outcomes are AOI-level fixation metrics (e.g., fixation duration, fixation count) for text and image warning elements; environmental concern was measured as a moderator. Study 2 (within-subjects, self-reports) — each participant evaluated both ads. Outcomes include valence, arousal, dominance (SAM), subjective attention (internal vs. external), and perceived effectiveness, alongside environmental concern and basic sociodemographics. Files in this record Study_1_final.sav — Eye-tracking dataset for Study 1 (lab). Core variables (high-level): participant ID (anonymized), condition assignment (gain vs. loss), AOI-level fixation metrics for warning-text and warning-image (e.g., total fixation duration [ms], fixation count), environmental concern (scale), data-quality indicators. Study_2_final.sav — Self-report dataset for Study 2 (survey/ratings). Core variables (high-level): participant ID (anonymized), ad identifier/order, SAM valence/arousal/dominance, subjective attention (internal–external), perceived effectiveness, environmental concern (scale), sociodemographics. Methods snapshot Stimuli & AOIs. Static car ads for a virtual brand to avoid trademark issues; standardized size and colors. Warnings included both text and image elements aligned to the assigned frame. AOIs for warning-text and warning-image were predefined and used consistently across participants. Eye-tracking (Study 1). Recorded with Tobii Pro hardware (60 Hz) and parsed in Tobii Pro Lab® using I-VT (≥ ~60 ms). Primary metrics are AOI-level fixation duration and count. Self-reports (Study 2). SAM (valence/arousal/dominance; 9-point), subjective attention (internal–external), perceived effectiveness (Likert), plus environmental concern and sociodemographics. Analytic orientation. Study 1 focused on multivariate comparisons of AOI metrics across framing conditions; Study 2 modeled within-person differences across ads, testing main effects and the role of environmental concern.

Related Organizations
Keywords

environmental warnings, Message Framing, SAM (valence-arousal-dominance), Consumer behaviour, Attention, marketing communication, Eye-Tracking Technology, Sustainable transport

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities