
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17412202 , 10.5281/zenodo.17815549 , 10.5281/zenodo.17092245 , 10.5281/zenodo.16869560 , 10.5281/zenodo.16869561 , 10.5281/zenodo.19885351 , 10.5281/zenodo.19885352 , 10.5281/zenodo.17815550 , 10.5281/zenodo.19368887 , 10.5281/zenodo.19368886 , 10.5281/zenodo.17412203 , 10.5281/zenodo.17092246
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17412202 , 10.5281/zenodo.17815549 , 10.5281/zenodo.17092245 , 10.5281/zenodo.16869560 , 10.5281/zenodo.16869561 , 10.5281/zenodo.19885351 , 10.5281/zenodo.19885352 , 10.5281/zenodo.17815550 , 10.5281/zenodo.19368887 , 10.5281/zenodo.19368886 , 10.5281/zenodo.17412203 , 10.5281/zenodo.17092246
The COVID-19 pandemic has precipitated an urgent and widespread demand for virtual communication solutions, leading to significant growth in the adoption of Unified Communication Solutions (UCS). Despite this expansion, existing methodologies for estimating the realized benefits and their impacts on business productivity remain inadequate, as they fail to encompass all available solutions in the market. Moreover, the substantial costs associated with these solutions often leave companies and enterprises struggling with uncertainties regarding return on investment, primarily due to the absence of a standardized benefit calculation approach. Consequently, there is a pressing need for standardized formula to uniformly calculate the benefits accrued from virtual communications. This paper aims to delineate the critical elements necessary for evaluating the benefits of virtual communications. Building on these foundational elements, a comprehensive formula will be introduced to standardize the assessment of virtual meeting benefits.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
