Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Lessons Learned from Official Airline Reports of Onboard Fumes and Smoke

Authors: Anderson, Judith;

Lessons Learned from Official Airline Reports of Onboard Fumes and Smoke

Abstract

The author reviewed and classified maintenance reports that cited smoke, odor, or fumes (SOFs) that US airlines sent to the FAA over four years between 2018 and 2023. The US fleet composition was also calculated to put the number of SOF reports on each aircraft type in perspective. “Fume events” (engine oil or hydraulic fluid) were the most common type of onboard SOFs reported by US airlines (43%), followed by electrical (20%), and fans (6.1%). During these years, A320fam aircraft made up 20% of the US fleet but 80% of the reported fume events. Conversely, B737fam aircraft made up 27% of the US fleet but only 3.0% of the reported fume events. Aircraft design features, airline reporting practices, and maintenance procedures that may contribute to these differences were reviewed. Pilots were most likely to document a fume event during descent (47%) and takeoff/climb (19%). The A320fam, MD80fam, A330, and ERJ140-145 aircraft were over-represented in other types of SOFs reports. Airline narratives show that the APU can be the primary source of oil/hydraulic fumes, even when it is not operating. Additionally, failure to find the source of fumes, rectify it, and clean any secondary sources of fumes can cause repeat events.

UPDATE of DATASET to paper: "Lessons Learned from Official Airline Reports of Onboard Fumes and Smoke" (https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12050437) in Special Issue "Aircraft Design" of the Jounal "Aeropace" at MDPI.

Related Organizations
Keywords

fumes, reporting, BeyondACAconference, smoke, fume events, design, aviatoin, oil, hydraulic fluid, airplane, maintenance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average