
These are 'large' NequIP/Allegro models, optimised for speed and accuracy with a greater priority placed on accuracy. The `MP` models are trained only on the `MPTrj` (~1.5M frames) datasets (i.e. matbench-discovery 'compliant'), and so are only recommended for benchmarking and not production work. The `OAM` modles are pre-trained on the `OMat24` dataset (~101M frames), and fine-tuned on the `sAlex` (~10.5M frames) and `MPTrj` (~1.5M frames) datasets. These are the recommended `NequIP`/`Allegro` models for most applications in inorganic solids, having been trained on the largest available open-access datasets. We find the NequIP OAM model to currently lie on the upper-right quadrant of the Pareto front when compared to other leading foundation models (preprint incoming), showing an optimal balance of speed and accuracy. See `nequip.net` and `matbench-discovery` submission for further details – in particular, for details on including model accelerations, and training config files. See https://nequip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/guide/training-techniques/fine_tuning.html for details on fine-tuning `NequIP`/`Allegro` models.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
