
Modern bioimaging generates data of extraordinary richness — and often extraordinary size. As researchers adopt ever more advanced instruments and techniques, the resulting datasets routinely exceed the capacity of local memory, standard file systems, and traditional analysis workflows. This talk traces the evolution of open-source infrastructure designed to meet this challenge, from early efforts to standardize microscopy metadata (OME-XML, Bio-Formats), to server-based platforms for managing and sharing data (OMERO), to cloud-native formats like OME-Zarr that support scalable storage and computation. Along the way, we’ll explore the practical obstacles and design decisions that shaped each generation of tooling: not just how to store large image datasets, but how to describe them, share them, and ultimately make them FAIR — Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. The story is not just one of technical progress, but of community-building, evolving standards, and an ongoing effort to ensure that valuable biological data remains usable across disciplines, platforms, and time. As bioimaging converges with other data-intensive fields, the lessons from this journey may resonate more widely — wherever data no longer “fits,” and where infrastructure must rise to meet it.
Presented at "International Symposium on Integrative Bioinformatics", Gatersleben Research Conference Series from September 10–12, 2025, https://meetings.ipk-gatersleben.de/grc-ib2025/
NFDI4BIOIMAGE is funded by DFG grant number NFDI 46/1, project number 501864659.
software, OME, bioimaging, infrastructure, FAIR
software, OME, bioimaging, infrastructure, FAIR
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
