Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Safeguarding India's Democracy: The Evolution and Fortification of Electoral Integrity

From Fragile Paper Ballots to AI-Enhanced Digital Ecosystems How India's Election System Has Evolved to Defend Every Vote Against Evolving Threats
Authors: Kallol, Chakrabarti;

Safeguarding India's Democracy: The Evolution and Fortification of Electoral Integrity

Abstract

India’s electoral journey, spanning over seven decades, has evolved from vulnerable paper ballots to a robust digital ecosystem fortified by AI, blockchain pilots, and rigorous audits, establishing a global benchmark for democratic integrity. The Election Commission of India (ECI) has transformed challenges like booth capturing and voter impersonation into opportunities for innovation, conducting over 100 elections without a single substantiated case of EVM tampering. With 97 crore voters, India’s system exemplifies scale, security, and inclusivity, reducing election costs from ₹2,000–3,100 crore to ₹400–575 crore and achieving 100% VVPAT audit match rates. Recent 2024–2025 verifications in state elections and 28 new ECI initiatives underscore unmatched transparency, with AI-driven purification eliminating 11 crore duplicate voter entries. This white paper traces this evolution, detailing safeguards like air-gapped EVMs, Aadhaar-linked voter verification, and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 protections against electoral offenses. It debunks myths, such as EVM hacking, with evidence of tamper-proof design and judicial validations. Global comparisons highlight India’s efficiency, with a ₹35–40 cost per vote against ₹650–1,200 in the USA, earning recognition from Harvard, MIT, and the UN. Forward-thinking proposals include blockchain audit trails, quantum-resistant encryption, and mobile voting centers to empower 2–3 crore migrant workers, ensuring inclusivity. Visual aids and a neutral tone enhance accessibility, while feasibility analyses outline practical implementation. To demonstrate viability, a pilot study in the 2026 state elections is proposed, testing blockchain-based audit trails and mobile voting centers in select constituencies. This white paper invites stakeholders to explore India’s electoral achievements, innovative safeguards, and actionable roadmap, reinforcing its position as the world’s largest, most secure democracy and inspiring continued excellence.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average