
Abstract Schools are increasingly grappling with challenges posed by generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies, exemplified by the omnipresence of chatbots and their repercussions for pedagogical practices. This paper explores the case of how ChatGPT unfolds in, and affects, students’ writing practices and what the implications are thereof. We conceptualise ChatGPT as a ‘thinking infrastructure’ that structures and affects attention, decision-making, and cognition. By researching two schools in Belgium and Germany, we discuss how students engage with ChatGPT when performing school tasks. Our analysis shows how ChatGPT affects students’ writing practices by generating habits , valuating knowledge , cultivating affinity , and prompting thought . This, we argue, illuminates shifts in what it means to be educated today. We suggest the need to further articulate the new conditions of learning emerging through GenAI technologies and propose the need for a pedagogy that fosters infrastructure literacy.
ChatGPT, Writing, Pedagogy, School education, Learning, AI literacy, Generative artificial intelligence, Thinking infrastructures
ChatGPT, Writing, Pedagogy, School education, Learning, AI literacy, Generative artificial intelligence, Thinking infrastructures
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
