Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Conference object . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Conference object . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Fuzzy Forest for Microbiome-Driven Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease

Authors: Ibrahimi, Eliana; Porreca, Annamaria; Ponsero, Alise;

Fuzzy Forest for Microbiome-Driven Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease

Abstract

The gut microbiome is increasingly recognized as a key modulator in the early pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease such as ischemic heart disease (IHD), offering both diagnostic potential and mechanistic insights before clinical symptom onset. Translating this promise into clinical tools requires advanced computational methods capable of extracting meaningful patterns from complex and noisy microbiome data. In this study, we compare three supervised machine learning algorithms, Lasso-regularized Generalized Linear Models (GLM), Random Forests (RF), and Fuzzy Forests (FF), to classify IHD from healthy controls, using gut microbiome profiles obtained from the Metacardis project (metacardis.net). The dataset included 375 patients with IHD and 275 healthy controls. Preprocessing included normalization, filtering of low-abundance taxa, and stratified train and test splitting. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with FF outperforming RF and Lasso-GLM in models classifying IHD from healthy subjects. The results from the FF algorithm are consistent with previously reported studies, which emphasize significant alterations in the abundance of various microbial taxa in IHD patients. Taxa such as Prevotella, Bacteroides, and Ruminococcus were among those exhibiting marked differences in abundance between IHD patients and healthy controls, suggesting their potential role in the disease’s etiology as previously reported. The ability of FF to identify key microbial taxa contributing to this separation provides valuable insights into potential biomarkers for early diagnosis and therapeutic targets. The superior performance of FF highlights its robustness in handling uncertainty and high dimensionality inherent in microbiome data, making it a promising tool for early IHD prediction and microbiome-related biomarker discovery.

Keywords

Cardiovascular Diseases, Machine Learning/classification, Gastrointestinal Microbiome

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green