Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Transparency and Accountability In Public Administration

Authors: Karna, Nisha;

Transparency and Accountability In Public Administration

Abstract

Transparency and accountability are fundamental to democratic governance, enhancing public trust, service delivery, and institutional integrity. This study explores how these principles can be effectively embedded within provincial administrations, focusing on Madhesh Province, Nepal. It investigates the intersection of legal frameworks, technological innovations, institutional oversight, and citizen engagement to understand both enablers and obstacles to good governance. Transparency provides access to information, while accountability ensures officials are answerable together forming the twin pillars of responsible administration. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study analyzes five South Asian provincial governments through comparative case studies, semi-structured interviews with thirty policymakers and civil society actors, and quantitative analysis of corruption perception indices and citizen satisfaction surveys. Document analysis of e-governance dashboards, procurement disclosures, and performance audits offers further triangulation. Findings reveal that robust legal provisions such as freedom of information laws—are necessary but insufficient without enforcement mechanisms. Key success factors include empowered anti-corruption bodies, real-time budget tracking systems, and transparent procurement processes. However, digital literacy gaps and resistance within bureaucratic culture limit the effectiveness of reforms. Capacity-building and ethical leadership are essential for sustaining progress. The study proposes a four-pronged framework: ° Legislative reinforcement via updated freedom of information and procurement laws; ° Technological enhancement through user-centric digital platforms; ° Institutional strengthening of independent oversight bodies; and ° Participatory mechanisms like community monitoring and citizen feedback loops. By offering empirically grounded, scalable recommendations, this research contributes to global public administration discourse. It emphasizes the need to align legal, technological, and cultural strategies for sustainable governance reform and identifies future research avenues in digital inclusion, participatory budgeting, and ethics training.

Keywords

transparency, accountability, governance reform, digital inclusion, public administration

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green