Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Assessment of resistant Escherichia coli in groundwater sources and sanitary inspection for contamination risk in Bagamoyo, Tanzania

Authors: Joram Japhet, Mduda;

Assessment of resistant Escherichia coli in groundwater sources and sanitary inspection for contamination risk in Bagamoyo, Tanzania

Abstract

Two billion people globally are using faecal-contaminated water. Consumption of Escherichia coli in fecal-contaminated waters poses a health risk due to its potential to cause diseases which highlights the need for understanding its factors for contamination and its antimicrobial resistance profile. Membrane filtration method was used to culture and isolate E. coli. The disk diffusion method was used to identify resistance of E. coli isolated and sanitary inspection was used to identify the contamination risk. The study found 44.8% of groundwater samples (n=73) were contaminated with E. coli, with 83.6% (n=61) of isolates showing antibiotic resistance. A Chi-square test revealed a statistically significant difference in resistance proportions across tested antibiotics (p < 0.001). High resistance rates were noted for cefazolin (56.16%, n=41), nitrofurantoin (54.79%, n=40), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (45.21%, n=33), and ceftriaxone (42.47%, n=31). Additionally, 70% of E. coli isolates (n=51) were multidrug-resistant. Sanitary inspections showed 46.2% (n=18) of dug wells had a high sanitary risk, while 73.3% (n=44) of boreholes had a low contamination-risk. However, even boreholes with a low sanitary risk showed a high rate of E. coli contamination. Tube wells with hand pumps and dug wells at high sanitary risk also had elevated rates of E. coli contamination. Findings showed high prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in groundwater in Bagamoyo, and highlight need for advocacy of proper use of antibiotics and proper hygiene to prevent the spread of resistant E. coli in groundwater. published by the Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences | JBES

Related Organizations
Keywords

Sanitary contamination risk, Antibiotic resistance, E. coli, Groundwater sources

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green