
This study employs a benchmark that couples 21 prompting techniques with 25 real-world PLC use cases, yielding 525 prompt–task evaluations across simple, medium, and complex scenarios. The prompting suite spans foundational methods (zero-/few-shot), reasoning-focused prompts (CoT, PoT, CoC, SCoT), utility and optimization prompts (documentation, OP, RaR, APE), verification and role prompts (CoVe, CoN, ReAct, AP, RBP), and vendor-/symbol-aware variants (RAG, ITP, CoS, CoTP, CCoT, MTPR). The industrial cases range from conveyor and tank-level control to CNC tool change, AGV docking, and robot pick–place, providing broad coverage of sequencing, safety interlocks, and multi-axis coordination. Each instance includes a problem description, an expected IEC~61131-3 output (ST/IL), and a human-verified ground truth, enabling consistent application of fixed prompts and fair comparison across vendors. This design supports reproducible ablations on prompting strategy, facilitates cross-task generalization studies, and allows researchers to select subsets aligned with their evaluation goals.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
