Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Stenarella victoriae

Authors: Santos, Bernardo F.; Bordera, Santiago;

Stenarella victoriae

Abstract

3.1.18.Stenarella victoriae(Cameron, 1912) Figures 1 B, 21, 22 F, 25 D, 28 Mesostenus victoriae Cameron, 1912: 179. Holotype ♀ (NHMUK, examined). Parasilsila trilineata Cheesman, 1936: 368. Holotype ♀ (NHMUK, examined). Synonymized by Townes et al. (1961). Diagnosis. Stenarella victoriae can be distinguished from all other Stenarella species by the combination of the following characters: mesoscutum densely punctate (Fig. 21 E); areolet usually open, vein 2 rs-m obliterated (Fig. 21 C); propodeum medially and posteriorly to anterior transverse carina coarsely transversely striate (Fig. 1 B); mesosoma black, with well defined whitish marks (Fig. 21 A, D, E, 22 F); propodeum with one medial posterior large whitish mark (Figs 1 B, 22 F). Description. FEMALE. Fore wing 10.0– 12.5 mm long. — Head (Fig. 21 A, B, D, E): Mandible, clypeus and face moderately setose. Mandible mostly sparsely punctate, MLW 2.1–2.25. Malar space short, MSM 0.40–0.45. Clypeus sparsely punctate, CWL 3.15–3.20. Clypeus slightly convex, face centrally distinctly convex. Face granulate – punctate, dorsomedially rougher, with median minute tubercle between antennal sockets. Frons and vertex mostly densely punctate, frons medially rugulose – punctate, with interrupted longitudinal carina. Antenna with 35–37 flagellomeres. — Mesosoma (Fig. 1 B, 21 A, C – E): Pronotum mostly smooth, with distinct longitudinal striae along anterior depression and posterior margin, dorsal lateral part strongly and densely punctate. Epomia long and strong, ending distinctly on pronotal collar. Mesoscutum densely punctate. Notaulus reaching 0.80 of mesoscutum, with minute transverse striae. Scutellum mostly punctate with central part smooth. Mesopleuron and metapleuron moderately setose. Mesopleuron dorsally densely punctate, centrally strigose punctate, ventrally rugulose punctate. Epicnemial carina weak (better seen in ventrolateral view), reaching 0.4–0.5 of distance to subtegular ridge. Sternaulus deep and sinuous, reaching posterior rim of mesopleuron. Metapleuron posterodorsally rugose punctate, anteriorly rugulose punctate and posteroventrally strigose punctate. Propodeum relatively long, dorsal profile in lateral view evenly convex and sloped. Anterior area of propodeum densely punctate, with median longitudinal carina distinct. Propodeal spiracle elliptic, SLW 5.0–5.25. Posterior area of propodeum anteriorly rugulose reticulate, posteriorly and medially, coarsely striate transversally, laterally rugulose striate. Posterior transverse carina of propodeum absent. Areolet small, open distally, APH 0.4–0.45. Vein 2 rs-m obliterated. Hind wing vein Cua distinctly longer than crossvein cu-a, HW 1 C 2.75–2.85. — Metasoma (Fig. 21 A, F): Posterior end of S 1 placed anterior to or approximately opposite to spiracle of T 1; T 1 LW 2.8–3.2; T 1 WW 2.4–2.5; T 2 LW 1.1–1.15; T 2 WW 2.1–2.15. T 2 minutely punctate reticulate on a granulate background. Dorsal valve of ovipositor with 8 teeth. Ventral valve with 11 teeth. OST 3.4–3.5. — Color (Figs 1 B, 21): Head mostly black: labrum, clypeus, face centrally, mandibles except distal part and eye orbits, whitish and f 7–13 (14) dorsally white. Mesosoma mostly black; propleuron widely, dorsal lateral margin, spot on medial dorsal part and a ventral anterior spot on pronotum, subtegular ridge, spot between median anterior part of mesopleuron and median posterior part of epicnemium, posterior ventral corner of mesopleuron, mesepisternum, dorsal division of metapleuron, wide dorsal mark on posterior part of metapleuron, central spot on mesoscutum, tegula, scutellum laterally and dorsally, and a large medial posterior spot on propodeum, yellow cream. Legs mostly orange; distal part of hind femur and tibia, base of t 1, and t 5 dark brown; distal part of t 1 and t 2–4 whitish. Wing hyaline. Metasoma mostly dark brown to black, T 1 – T 8 posteriorly yellow cream banded. — MALE (Fig. 22 F). Fore wing 8.7–10.2 mm long. — Head: MLW 1.9–2.0; MSM about 0.36. CWL 2.6–2.7. Antenna with 32–37 flagellomeres. Tyloids on f 14 – f 18, sometimes on f 15–18 or f 13–19. — Mesosoma: SLW 5.5–6.0., HW 1 C 2.2–2.7. — Metasoma: Posterior end of S 1 placed posterior to spiracle of T 1; T 1 LW 4.9–5.1; T 1 WW 1.5–2.0; T 2 LW 1.4–1.8; T 2 WW 2.2–2.4. — Color: As female, but antenna with f 7 – f 19 dorsally white, first one and last one partially, some specimens without white band; face and mesosternum entirely whitish. Other characters as in female. Comments According to Gauld (1984), this species is “ fairly common in Queensland and New South Wales ”, and it is well-represented in Australian collections. Hosts. Auplopus sp. (Hymenoptera; Pompilidae), Sceliphron sp. (Hymenoptera; Sphecidae). Distribution. Australasian. Known records from Australia (Queensland, Tasmania, Victoria) (Fig. 25 D). Material examined. 10 ♀♀, 2 ♂♂. AUSTRALIA • 1 ♀; Queensland, Acadia Ridge; 20. Dec. 1979, G. Gordhi (USNM) • 1 ♀ 1 ♂; same data except 29. Dec. 1979 • 1 ♀; same date except 30. Dec. 1979 • 1 ♀; Queensland, Rockhampton; 1870; Thozet, (MNHN) • 1 ♀, Tasmania, Verreaux; March 1947 (MNHN) • 1 ♀ 1 ♂; Queensland, N. of Mt. Molloy, Kingfisher Park, Julatten, 14.XI.1996, G. R. Else • 1 ♀; Queensland, Brisvane, Gap, Ashgrove, August, F. G. Smith (USUC) • 1 ♀; Queensland, Rockhampton; Coll. Bingham (MFNB) • 1 ♀; Victoria; Musk, 25.II–4.III.2016; A. Campoy Leg.; Rza. 1; Malaise trap (CEUA) • 1 ♀, 1 ♂; Victoria; same locality but 6–19.I.2017; A. Campoy Leg.; Rza. 24; Malaise trap (CEUA).

Published as part of Santos, Bernardo F. & Bordera, Santiago, 2025, Phylogenomics and taxonomic revision of Stenarella Szépligeti (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Cryptinae), pp. 463-511 in Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 83 on pages 463-511, DOI: 10.3897/asp.83.e151385

Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Stenarella victoriae, Animalia, Biodiversity, Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Stenarella, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?