
Modern physics remains divided across four foundational frameworks: General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Thermodynamics, and Information Theory. Each captures essential aspects of nature, yet none provides a universal principle reconciling geometry, indeterminacy, dissipation, and organization. The Universal Functional Coherence Theory (UFCT) addresses this gap by introducing functional coherence (χ) as an ontological variable with canonical dimension T⁻². Its evolution is governed by two complementary equations: a dynamic law, formulated as a nonlinear diffusion–dissipation equation (∂tχ + ∇·(−Dχ∇χ) = −κ·Dχ·ψ·χ²), which ensures irreversibility and establishes the arrow of time; and an equilibrium law (χ_eq = (αℛ + βη)/ψ), which defines the structural attractor toward which all evolution converges. Together, these laws secure dimensional closure (all terms scale as T⁻³) and establish a teleodynamic ontology: time as irreversible dissipation and space as stabilized equilibrium. From this structure emerge universal invariants — κ ≈ 0.17, the dissipation constant confirmed in quantum annealers and random quantum circuits; d_f ≈ 4.125, a fractal dimension of large- scale cosmic structure; and Ξ₀, the ontological pixel representing the minimal quantum of execution of reality. These invariants provide falsifiable signatures across quantum, condensed matter, and cosmological domains. By recovering established theories in appropriate limits and yielding novel, testable predictions, UFCT positions itself as a rigorous and unifying framework for the fundamental laws of physics.
functional coherence; unification of physics; dynamic law; equilibrium law; irreversibility; fractal dimension; universal invariants; teleodynamics
functional coherence; unification of physics; dynamic law; equilibrium law; irreversibility; fractal dimension; universal invariants; teleodynamics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
