Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Lowland (2013) stages, within the intimate space of a Bengali middle-class household and a Rhode Island apartment, the cultural conflict between a constitutional nationalism concerned with civic order and an anti-state Naxalite insurgency that sought radical transformation through violence. Read as a cultural site rather than as a partisan tract, the novel shows how public choices and clandestine acts return home as ethical burdens distributed across kinship, caregiving, and memory. Anchored in the documented chronology of Naxalbari (1967), the CPI(ML) formation (1969), and subsequent counterinsurgency in 1971–72, the analysis traces Lahiri’s relocation of ideology into domestic time: the killing of an insurgent organiser, Udayan, is not a climax but the beginning of decades of household repair. The reading emphasizes a constitutional frame, care ethics, and the pedagogic responsibilities of family life, rejecting any romanticization of violent, divisive, anti-constitutional action. While acknowledging critical debates about “under-politicization,” the paper demonstrates that Lahiri’s restraint clarifies duty, lawful order, and the costs of misled choices for present and future generations.