Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Best Practices for preprint peer review services in the use of AI

Authors: Coates, Jonathon;

Best Practices for preprint peer review services in the use of AI

Abstract

This document provides guidance for preprint peer review services on the responsible integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, establishing guiding principles and practical steps to support transparency, ethical practice, and research integrity. Life science preprints have increased in adoption since 2013 with a growth of journal-agnostic peer review services since 2017. The use of large language models (LLMs) and other AI tools is rapidly changing research and peer review, raising opportunities for improved efficiency and equity but also risks of fraud, bias, and loss of human judgment. These best practices are designed to encourage responsible use of these tools, without being overly burdensome. Scope These best practices are designed for any preprint peer review service, evaluation service or journal organising peer review. Although the guidance focuses on the Life Sciences, it is not exclusive to this field. These particular best practices are not designed for peer reviewers themselves. These best practices and associated guidance may be partially applicable to peer review services that rely exclusively on AI approaches, without human oversight. Adopting these best practices will help peer review services and potentially traditional journals in ensuring safe, fair, and transparent use of AI in scientific publishing, safeguarding integrity and supporting community trust.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average