
BackgroundIn this study we evaluated the effectiveness of Regression Therapy (RT) to treat a broad spectrum of psychopathological and or Medical Unexplained Symptoms complaints (MUS). Regression therapy aims to identify and address the root cause of an individual's current emotional, psychological, or physical issues by accessing forgotten or suppressed memories that are present in the subconscious domain Methods A total of 169 subjects filled out a BSI-53 questionnaire before initiation of treatment as well as after 2 and 4 months of therapy. Fifteen established RT therapists conducted therapy according to a standardized protocol. Questionnaires were submitted anonymously to a commercial company that analysed the results and reported to an independent assessor. ResultsRT proved to be highly effective. The BSI-53 total score decreased from a value of 0.91 to 0.48 after 4 months of treatment. A score of 0.48 is close to the value of 0.42 measured in a representative sample of the Dutch population. For most study participants a single session was already satisfactory. Hedges g for this study was 0.95 indicating a large clinical effect. All 9 domains of the BSI-53 questionnaire showed a similar decrease in score, the mean decrease was 47%. Application of unbiased machine learning to all study parameters revealed that a positive effect of the therapy could be predicted from a few BSI-53 questions with high accuracy (AUC: 0,87). Limitations This blinded outcome trial was not compared to an active control.ConclusionThis study shows that RT is a highly efficacious treatment modality. It is fast, a few sessions already strongly alleviate psychological and physical symptoms.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
