
The reform of research assessment has become a central issue in European research policy, driven by the need to move beyond traditional, metric-based evaluation models towards qualitative, responsible, and Open Science-aligned approaches. The Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment (ARRA), developed by the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA), outlines principles for transitioning towards fairer, more inclusive, and transparent assessment frameworks, incorporating interdisciplinary research, Open Science, knowledge transfer, and societal engagement (CoARA, 2022). As an early signatory of CoARA, the University of Rijeka (UNIRI) has played a leading role in research assessment reform in Croatia. It is currently the only Croatian institution to endorse CoARA and has actively engaged with national stakeholders to initiate discussions on ARRA principles. UNIRI has implemented institutional policy changes, structural transformations, and pilot initiatives, drawing from its participation in European-funded projects, particularly OPUS, SECURE, and OSCAR. Additionally, it has contributed to the YUFE4Postdocs initiative, a joint effort of the Young Universities for the Future of Europe (YUFE) alliance partners, which has piloted narrative CVs as an alternative researcher evaluation model (YUFE, 2023). Drawing on lessons learned from these initiatives, this paper presents a case study of research assessment reform at UNIRI, offering practical insights into challenges, solutions, and policy recommendations that can guide other institutions navigatingsimilar transitions.
This work was presented at the Research Evaluation in Social Sciences and Humanities Conference (RESSSH 2025)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
