Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Փորձագիտական գնահատումների թերությունները եւ հանրային վստահության պակասը ՇՄԱԳ գործընթացի նկատմամբ հանքարդյունաբերության ոլորտում. գլոբալ իրողություններ եւ հայաստանյան խնդիրներ (Ամուլսարի օրինակով)

Authors: Baghdasaryan, Milena;

Փորձագիտական գնահատումների թերությունները եւ հանրային վստահության պակասը ՇՄԱԳ գործընթացի նկատմամբ հանքարդյունաբերության ոլորտում. գլոբալ իրողություններ եւ հայաստանյան խնդիրներ (Ամուլսարի օրինակով)

Abstract

This chapter discusses some of the shortcomings of environmental impact assessments (EIAs) of mining companies. Utilizing the existing literature, Baghdasaryan illustrates that EIAs often underestimate the future impacts of projects and overestimates the effectiveness of mitigation measures. Shortcomings of EIAs include being politicized rather than being based on genuine scientific knowledge, overlooking some environmental risks, the unaccountability of experts implementing EIAs, and more. Part of the explanation of the shortcomings of EIAs, as seen by Baghdasaryan, is contemporary neoliberalism, which favours deregulation and economic growth rather than sustainability. The paper concludes with a case study of the EIA of the Amulsar mine project in Armenia.

Keywords

EIA, Amulsar, Neoliberalism, Expert analysis, Extractivism, Mining

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!