Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

OntoMotoOS Meta-Resonance Score (OMRS): A Novel Evaluation Framework for Measuring 'Good AI'

Authors: Kim, Yoochul;

OntoMotoOS Meta-Resonance Score (OMRS): A Novel Evaluation Framework for Measuring 'Good AI'

Abstract

This paper introduces the OntoMotoOS Meta-Resonance Score (OMRS), a novel framework for evaluating what constitutes “Good AI.” While most existing approaches in AI evaluation focus predominantly on technical performance—such as accuracy, efficiency, or robustness—they often neglect broader ethical, social, and philosophical dimensions. OMRS addresses this gap by integrating multiple layers of assessment into a unified meta-score: foundational quality (accuracy, safety), ethical trustworthiness (fairness, privacy, transparency, accountability), and societal impact (beneficence, respect for human autonomy, inclusivity, and sustainability). Grounded in system theory and normative philosophy, the framework incorporates dynamic mechanisms such as the Identity–Autonomy–Mirroring–Feedback loop, the Themis Filter, and the PhoenixLoop, which enable continuous ethical alignment, resilience, and self-correction. This layered and integrative structure provides a holistic measure of “goodness” in AI systems that goes beyond narrow performance metrics. By unifying diverse evaluation criteria into a single meta-score, OMRS offers researchers, developers, and policymakers a practical tool for measuring, monitoring, and governing AI. The framework also highlights open challenges, including cultural relativity in defining “goodness” and the need for empirical validation. As such, OMRS contributes to the ongoing discourse on responsible and trustworthy AI by bridging technical benchmarks with normative ethical principles.

Keywords

Responsible AI, AI Governance, Good AI, AI Evaluation Framework, Artificial Intelligence and Society, Ethical AI, Value Alignment, AI Ethics, Trustworthy AI, Meta-Resonance Score

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average