
The way individuals approach activities in the fields of education, professional work, and creativity has altered dramatically as a result of the widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek. This study examines the effects of user prompt structure and clarity on the efficiency and efficacy of LLM outputs. We examine AI usage patterns, prompting techniques, and user satisfaction using information from 243 survey participants with a range of educational and professional backgrounds. The findings demonstrate that users report greater work efficiency and better results when they use prompts that are explicit, structured, and context-aware. These results highlight how crucial prompt engineering is to optimizing the benefits of generative AI and offer useful ramifications for its daily application.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Human-Computer Interaction, Large Language Model, Artificial intelligence, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Artificial Intelligence, I.2.7, 68T50 68T50 68T50, Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Human-Computer Interaction, Large Language Model, Artificial intelligence, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Artificial Intelligence, I.2.7, 68T50 68T50 68T50, Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
