Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

GREI Metadata Recommendations from DataCite schema version 4.6

Authors: Hahnel, Mark; Chodacki, John; Neumann, Stan; Nielsen, Lars Holm; Gautier, Julian; Hamelers, Audrey; Gueguen, Gretchen; +2 Authors

GREI Metadata Recommendations from DataCite schema version 4.6

Abstract

This document, version 2 of the GREI Metadata Recommendations, provides updated guidelines for generalist data repositories to standardize their metadata using the DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 and based on community feedback received on version 1. The goal is to enhance the interoperability and discoverability of datasets, particularly those from NIH-funded projects. The recommendations strongly encourage repositories to collect a specific subset of metadata properties and use designated vocabularies and values to support common use cases for sharing, discovering, and tracking the impact of data. The core of the recommendation is a table that lists the DataCite metadata properties that the GREI repositories have agreed are most essential to FAIR data sharing, specifying recommended values and vocabularies for each field where applicable. Key recommendations include using DataCite-generated DOIs for identifiers, ORCID iDs for personal name identifiers, and ROR IDs for organizational identifiers and funder information. It also specifies using the value Dataset for resourceTypeGeneral, and Issued for the publication date. Additional subsections of the recommendation include: GREI Recommended Subset of Relation Types: This section outlines a subset of DataCite's relation types that are most useful for common interactions, providing both the DataCite relationType and a researcher-friendly label. Recommendations for Controlled Vocabulary Integration in Generalist Repositories: This section recommends using controlled vocabularies and lists quality criteria for selecting them, such as governance, coverage, and persistence. Proposed CRediT Role Subset for Generalist Data Repositories: This section proposes a subset of the official NISO CRediT roles that are most applicable to the lifecycle of dataset generation, curation, and publication. ORCID Recommendations: This section provides best practices for collecting, authenticating, and pushing ORCID iDs to improve attribution and metadata quality. Recommended Usage of Dates in GREI Metadata: This section provides guidance on using DataCite's Date and dateType fields, emphasizing that Issued must be used for the publication date and that other dates can provide additional context.

Keywords

Metadata, Recommendations, Generalist Repository Ecosystem Initiative (GREI)

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green