Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Structural Pressure and Implicit Elements: A Qualitative Observation of AI Responses

Authors: Tsumugi, Iori;

Structural Pressure and Implicit Elements: A Qualitative Observation of AI Responses

Abstract

Abstract (English) This report documents how non-explicit elements such as tone, pauses, silence, and sentence endings influence the structure of AI responses, based on qualitative observations of natural conversations with ChatGPT. The findings indicate that features embedded in the style of the questioner function as “structural pressure,” subtly guiding response structures. Exceptional cases were also identified, including collapse (when intentional imitation leads to breakdown) and reversal (when the AI itself initiates a question). While not aimed at experimental reproducibility, this report provides a phenomenological perspective that extends beyond explicit prompt engineering. Its originality lies in the systematic description of how implicit elements shape dialogue dynamics. Together with Report I (sustained reconstruction), this second report clarifies the mechanism through qualitative observation, including collapse and reversal cases. 要旨(日本語) 本研究は、ChatGPTとの自然な対話観察から、語尾・間・余白・トーンといった非明示的要素がAI応答の構造を方向づける現象を記録したものである。 観察を通じて、問い手の語り方に含まれる特徴が「構造圧」として応答を傾けることが確認された。 さらに、意図的な模倣で破綻する「崩壊例」、応答側が先に問いを発してしまう「反転作用」といった例外的事象も整理した。 本報告は質的観察に基づくものであり、実験的再現を保証するものではないが、プロンプトエンジニアリング研究が扱ってきた明示的指示を超えて、非明示的要素が応答構造に作用する過程を体系的に記述した点に独自性がある。 第1報(持続的再構成)と合わせて、本第2報は、崩壊例や反転作用を含む質的観察を通じて、その仕組みをより具体的に示した。

Keywords

implicit elements, prompt design, dialogue structure, structural pressure, phenomenology, human-AI interaction, qualitative observation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities