
Supporting datasets of upscaled forest extent and annual forest loss due to fire for Wallace and Ng et al. (2025)John M. Wallace, Chan-Pang Ng, David Battisti, Qiang Fu, Jinhyuk E. Kim, Katrina S. Virts, and L. Ruby Leung (2025). The Increasing Incidence of Wildfires and Its Causes: An Overview, [Manuscript submitted to BAMS] Users who use the 0.25 degree datasets provided, be sure to cite the appropriate datasets and papers provided in the explanation of each file below. Data from the "Global forest loss due to fire" found at https://glad.umd.edu/dataset/Fire_GFL (Tyukavina et al. 2022) is aggregated to the 0.25 degree resolution and provided in "global_forest_loss_fire_total_annual_2001-23_fraction_025deg.nc". The file contains fraction of 0.25 degree gridcell where forest loss due to fire occured for each year throughout the record. The band number goes from 0-23, where each band number is associated with the year of forest loss (e.g. band 1 = 2001, band 2 = 2002, ... band 23 = 2023). Band 0 is an exception and is the sum of all the bands representing total forest loss due to fire throughout the record.To analyze the loss of forest cover in respect to initial forest cover from 2000, we first define forest cover using the tree cover in 2000 dataset found at https://data.globalforestwatch.org/documents/941f17325a494ed78c4817f9bb20f33a/explore (Hansen et al. 2013). We also aggregated tree cover data into 0.25 deg gridcells in similar fashion provided as "hansen_tree_cover_025deg.nc". This 0.25 deg dataset is not used in the analysis, but we provide it nonetheless. Using the original 30 m tree cover dataset, we define a pixel to be forest if the 30 m pixel had tree cover greater than or equal to 30%. We then aggregate to the 0.25 deg gridcells which is then defined as forest coverin the manuscript. We note that forest cover is not the same forest cover that defines forests in Tyukavina et al. (2022), since they did not define forest cover with a single tree cover threshhold. However, given we aggregate the data to 0.25 deg, we assume that this accounts for variability in defined forest cover. This file is provided as "hansen_forest_cover_025deg.nc" References Tyukavina, A., Potapov, P., Hansen, M.C., Pickens, A., Stehman, S., Turubanova, S., Parker, D., Zalles, V., Lima, A., Kommareddy, I., Song, X-P, Wang, L. and Harris, N. (2022) Global trends of forest loss due to fire, 2001-2019. Frontiers in Remote Sensing https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2022.825190 Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R., Kommareddy, A., Egorov, A., Chini, L., Justice, C. O., & Townshend, J. R. G. (2013). High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change. Science, 342(6160), 850–853. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
