Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Occupational Health and Safety Practices in Genetic Disease Diagnostic Centers: A Statistical Analysis of Risk Factors

Authors: Vedat Caner;

Occupational Health and Safety Practices in Genetic Disease Diagnostic Centers: A Statistical Analysis of Risk Factors

Abstract

This study aims to identify key occupational health and safety (OHS) risks in genetic disease diagnostic centers (GDDCs) and provide evidence-based recommendations to enhance workplace safety. A cross-sectional descriptive research design was employed. Data were collected from 150 laboratory professionals working in 15 public and private GDDCs in Istanbul. A validated structured survey was used to gather information across six domains: physical and chemical hazards, personal protective equipment (PPE) compliance, risk perception, ergonomic conditions, training, and incident history. Descriptive statistics and correlation analyses were performed to explore relationships between safety variables and accident occurrences. The findings revealed that low PPE compliance, inadequate ergonomic setups, and limited risk awareness were major contributors to workplace accidents. Conversely, institutions that provided structured OHS training and implemented routine safety monitoring showed significantly lower accident rates. Additionally, improvements in ventilation systems, chemical storage practices, and training participation were associated with better safety outcomes. The study concludes that occupational safety in GDDCs is strongly influenced by PPE usage, ergonomic infrastructure, and safety awareness. Interventions focused on these areas can significantly reduce injury risks and contribute to the development of a safer and more compliant laboratory environment.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average