
Abstract Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across many NLP tasks, but their performance on domain-specific named entity recognition (NER), such as in the biomedical field, remains limited. Meanwhile, BERT-based models continue to achieve strong results in biomedical NER but require substantial amounts of high-quality annotated data. In this work, we investigate how to harness LLMs to generate auxiliary annotation data for BERT-based NER models, offering a cost-effective alternative to manual annotation. We address three key research questions: (1) whether LLMs or fine-tuned BERT models provide more effective weak supervision for improving BERT-based NER, (2) how to best integrate augmented and gold-standard data during training, and (3) how factors such as data source and augmentation size affect downstream performance. In particular, we introduce a structured supervision framework where an LLM is fine-tuned to generate entity annotations in a context-rich JSON format, which are decoded into token-level labels for BERT training. Experimental results on the biomedical NER dataset show that LLM-generated auxiliary annotation data effectively enhances BERT performance. Our findings provide practical insights into designing hybrid systems that combine LLMs and BERT for scalable, high-quality biomedical NER. This article is part of the Proceedings of the BioCreative IX Challenge and Workshop (BC9): Large Language Models for Clinical and Biomedical NLP at the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
