
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) promise to transform transportation by improving road-safety, increasingmobility access, and enabling new mobility services. This paper presents a comprehensive systems-level review andpractical draft design for contemporary autonomous cars, covering levels of driving automation, sensor suites,perception pipelines, localization and mapping strategies, motion-planning and control architectures, simulationand evaluation approaches, and safety/ethical considerations. We summarize current industry and standardsperspectives on automation levels, then present a modular architecture that integrates multi-sensor perception(camera, LiDAR, radar), real-time sensor fusion and object tracking, simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM),behavior planning (route and tactical), and trajectory generation and low-level control. Important algorithmicchoices—classical (A*, RRT, MPC) and learning-based (deep perception networks, reinforcement learning fordecision-making)—are compared with their strengths and failure modes. The draft includes recommendedsoftware/hardware stacks, data pipelines, validation approaches (closed-track testing and large-scale simulation),and metrics for safety and performance evaluation. It also examines practical failure modes (sensor occlusion,adverse weather, distributional shift), regulatory and ethical constraints, and socio-economic impacts. Wherepossible the design favors explainable, verifiable methods that enable safety cases supported by reproducibletesting. Finally, the paper outlines a staged roadmap for development from Level 2/3 driver-assistance prototypesto Level 4 operational design domains (ODDs). The review and draft aim to be a pragmatic blueprint both forresearch teams and startups seeking to build safe, testable autonomous driving systems while acknowledging openresearch challenges and policy needs.
autonomous vehicle, perception, sensor fusion, SLAM, motion planning, safety, SAE J3016
autonomous vehicle, perception, sensor fusion, SLAM, motion planning, safety, SAE J3016
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
