Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Encoding Sacred Design: A Symbolic-Epistemic AI Framework for Ethical Generation of Andalusian Islamic Motifs

Authors: Kholoud Ghaith;

Encoding Sacred Design: A Symbolic-Epistemic AI Framework for Ethical Generation of Andalusian Islamic Motifs

Abstract

This study introduces the “architectural genome”, a symbolic-epistemic framework that reconfigures Islamic architectural motifs into machine-readable ontologies for ethical engagement with generative artificial intelligence (AI). Existing AI models frequently reproduce Islamic sacred forms as decontextualized aesthetic fragments, perpetuating what has been termed “algorithmic orientalism”. In contrast, the architectural genome encodes motifs with layered metadata across four dimensions: visual geometry, theological function, cultural provenance, and ethical viability, ensuring that generative systems interpret sacred content with symbolic fidelity and refusal-aware governance. Drawing from a curated corpus of 150 motifs from Andalusian heritage sites, the study validates its framework through a sandboxed Stable Diffusion environment. It performs comparative benchmarking against CIDOC CRM, Dublin Core, and Wikidata. Results indicate a very strong positive association (r = 1.0, p < 0.001) between ontological density and ethical refusal tagging, underscoring the viability of symbolic depth as a predictive marker for motif exclusion. This work advances cross-cultural AI ethics by operationalizing epistemic sovereignty and refusal logic in computational pipelines, offering a scalable blueprint for respectful, spiritually attuned AI-generated cultural heritage.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green