
Academic self-efficacy, understood as students’ belief in their capability to manage academic tasks and overcome challenges, is widely recognized as a key factor in educational success. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) tools, such as adaptive learning systems, virtual tutors, and AI-driven analytics, have been increasingly integrated into higher education. This correlational study examines the association between students’ engagement with AI tools and their perceived academic self-efficacy in Israeli universities. Based on self-report data from 102 undergraduate and graduate students, collected through a validated academic self-efficacy questionnaire, the study examines how the frequency and nature of AI tool usage relate to students’ confidence in handling academic challenges. The results reveal a weak but statistically significant positive correlation between AI usage and self-efficacy. As this is a correlational study, no causal conclusions can be drawn. Nonetheless, the findings may provide preliminary insights for curriculum developers and educational policymakers aiming to support student motivation through the informed use of AI technologies. Further research is needed to explore the specific types of AI tools that may support academic confidence and how their long-term use interacts with students' self-directed learning. These findings underscore the relevance of AI integration in higher education and highlight the need for thoughtful implementation strategies that enhance students’ academic confidence and learning autonomy.
Artificial intelligence, students, higher education, self-efficacy, universities
Artificial intelligence, students, higher education, self-efficacy, universities
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
