
This database was created by a joint effort from the Realistic 3D research group at Mid Sweden University (Sundsvall, Sweden) and the School of Telecommunications Engineering in Xidian University (Xi'an, China). The database details are explained thoroughly in the publication, which is accepted (and to appear in the proceedings of) the 27th IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP) in 2025. You can use this database in your work under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) licence, provided that you cite the database as below: Zerman, E., Takhtardeshir, S., Trioux, A., Qin, J., Wu, W., Olsson, R., & Sjöström, M. (2025). Subjective Visual Quality Assessment of Compressed Light Field Images: Learning-based vs. Conventional Methods. The 27th IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP).DOI: (To be updated after publication) BibTeX: @inproceedings{zerman2025subjective title = {Subjective Visual Quality Assessment of Compressed Light Field Images: Learning-based vs. Conventional Methods}, author = {Zerman, Emin and Takhtardeshir, Soheib and Trioux, Anthony and Qin, Jianlong and Wu, Wenjie and Olsson, Roger and Sj{\"o}str{\"o}m, M{\aa}rten}, booktitle = {The 27th IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP)}, year = {2025}, organization = {IEEE}} This database contains 85 light field stimuli, rendered as pseudo-video sequences with a spiral trajectory, and the subjective quality scores collected by 40 people in two different countries (19 in Mid Sweden University, Sweden; and 21 in Xidian University, China). The 85 LF stimuli were generated from 5 source LFs using 4 different LF compression methods, comprising two conventional methods (H.265/HEVC and JPEG Pleno) and two learning-based methods (RLVC and EF-VAE).
Signal processing, subjective quality assessment, autoencoders, Machine learning, light field compression, cross-lab study, perceived quality
Signal processing, subjective quality assessment, autoencoders, Machine learning, light field compression, cross-lab study, perceived quality
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
