Good Practices in the Legal Review of Weapons, Means and Methods of Warfare
Good Practices in the Legal Review of Weapons, Means and Methods of Warfare
This document contains a set of good practices that may assist States in carrying out legal reviews of autonomous weapon systems (‘AWS’) in a manner that accounts for their unique characteristics. Adoption of these practices can enhance the efficacy of legal reviews as a mechanism for implementing international legal obligations relevant to AWS. Considering that legal reviews are undertaken at the national level and that States have significant discretion in terms of the conduct of the reviews, some or all of these practices could be independently adopted by States, or agreed as representing good practice with other States.
- UNSW Sydney Australia
- University of Queensland Australia
- UNSW Canberra Australia
weapons, law of armed conflict, legal review of new weapons, international humanitarian law, autonomous weapon systems, International law
weapons, law of armed conflict, legal review of new weapons, international humanitarian law, autonomous weapon systems, International law
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!