Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In biomedicine, good metadata is crucial to finding experimental datasets, to understand how experiments were performed, and to reuse data to conduct new analyses. Despite the growing number of efforts to define guidelines and standards to describe biomedical experiments, the impediments to creating accurate, complete, and consistent metadata are still considerable. Authoring good metadata is a tedious and time-consuming task that biomedical scientists tend to avoid. The Center for Expanded Data Annotation and Retrieval (CEDAR) is developing novel methods and tools to simplify the process by which investigators annotate their experimental data with metadata. The CEDAR Workbench (https://cedar.metadatacenter.net) is a set of Web-based tools for the acquisition, storage, search, and reuse of metadata templates. As a step towards decreasing authoring time while increasing metadata quality, we have enhanced the CEDAR Workbench with value recommendation capabilities. Our system identifies common patterns in the CEDAR metadata repository, and generates real-time suggestions for filling out metadata acquisition forms. These suggestions are context-sensitive, meaning that the values predicted for a particular field are generated and ranked based on previously entered values. Our value recommendation approach supports both free-text values and terms from ontologies and controlled terminologies. We demonstrate CEDAR's intelligent authoring capabilities, and show how the technology that we are developing leverages existing metadata to make the authoring of high-quality metadata a manageable task.
CEDAR is supported by grant U54 AI117925 awarded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases through funds provided by the trans-NIH Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) initiative (www.bd2k.nih.gov)
{"references": ["Panahiazar et al. Context Aware Recommendation Engine for Metadata Submission. First Int Work Capturing Sci Knowl. 2015;3\u20137."]}
biomedical informatics, big data, CEDAR, BD2K, metadata, ontologies, BD2K_AHM
biomedical informatics, big data, CEDAR, BD2K, metadata, ontologies, BD2K_AHM
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts