Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://doi.org/10.3...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.i...
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

ECLIPSE: A systematic falsification framework for consciousness

AFH MODEL 4.2. : METODOLOGY
Authors: Sjöberg Tala, Camilo Alejandro;

ECLIPSE: A systematic falsification framework for consciousness

Abstract

Consciousness research lacks falsification protocols that underpin mature sciences, enabling post‑hoc rationalizations of negative results and slowing theoretical progress. Convergent work toward structural approaches highlights the need for standardized validation infrastructure for systematic theory evaluation. We present ECLIPSE, a five‑stage falsification framework for consciousness science: irreversible data splitting with cryptographic verification, pre‑registered thresholds, clean development, single‑shot validation, and final assessment — eliminating statistical opportunism and ensuring transparent generalization testing. Using 153 polysomnographic EEG recordings (126,160 windows, Sleep‑EDF database), ECLIPSE was applied to two structural implementations of a consciousness‑detection framework. Both versions failed pre‑registered criteria (v3.7: F1 = 0.031; v4.1: F1 = 0.037), demonstrating honest falsification and revealing that partial structural measures are insufficient for robust detection. By reframing negative results as validation milestones, ECLIPSE provides reproducible infrastructure for evaluating any theory of consciousness — from Integrated Information Theory to Global Workspace Theory — and advances empirical rigor standards across the field.

Keywords

Consciousness, Computational neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Theory of Mind, Neuroscien, Cognitive neuroscience, Mind

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
hybrid
Related to Research communities