Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

In vivo comparison of recording capabilities between PEDOT:PSS/DES and PEDOT:PSS coated electrodes

Authors: Güemes, Amparo;

In vivo comparison of recording capabilities between PEDOT:PSS/DES and PEDOT:PSS coated electrodes

Abstract

This dataset contains electrophysiological recordings from in vivo experiments conducted on rat sciatic nerves to compare the performance of PEDOT:PSS and PEDOT:PSS/DES electrode coatings. Each nerve underwent a recording protocol lasting approximately 1 hour, consisting of the following phases: 1) Spontaneous and pain-evoked activity: 5-minute baseline recording, followed by repeated mechanical stimulation of the tibialis anterior muscle using a needle press to evoke nociceptive responses. No electrical stimulation was applied in this phase. 2) Electrical stimulation protocol: Stimulation was delivered through the implanted cuffs in monopolar configuration using single pulses (100 µs pulse width). Amplitude was increased incrementally: 5–10 µA (1 µA steps), followed by 15, 20, and 30 µA. Each stimulation trial included a 10-second baseline and 10 stimulation pulses at 1 Hz (1-second inter-pulse interval) starting with one cuff followed by 10 pulses by the other cuff. Cuffs were alternated across trials to compare responses. Each file corresponds to one recording or stimulation trial for a specific rat, nerve, and protocol phase (e.g., spontaneous, evoked, or stimulation). Each .pkl file contains data from three INTAN ports: Port A: PEDOT:PSS/DES cuff (used for stimulation and recording) Port B: PEDOT:PSS cuff (used for stimulation and recording) Port C: EMG needle electrode (used only during stimulation trials to monitor muscle responses Important usage notes: For recording trials (spontaneous or evoked activity), only Ports A and B are relevant. Port C can be ignored. For stimulation trials, Port C contains EMG signals of interest. Ports A and B were used only for stimulation and may not contain meaningful data. Channels with impedance >100 kΩ were excluded from the recordings.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average