
This paper examines how algorithmic personalization in media platforms and AI personal assistants can foster radicalization by reinforcing initial biases and limiting exposure to diverse perspectives. Drawing from cognitive psychology and empirical research, we explore mechanisms such as the anchoring effect and the continued influence of misinformation, highlighting how early, incorrect impressions can persist even when corrected. We argue for the development of 'thinking AI'—systems designed to challenge rather than merely please—capable of promoting discernment, critical thinking, and cognitive resilience.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
