Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Biocultural Governance and AI's Role in Emergent Sovereignty Operationalizing Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Governance in Sustainable Development

Authors: Flores, WarīN;

Biocultural Governance and AI's Role in Emergent Sovereignty Operationalizing Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Governance in Sustainable Development

Abstract

The future of governance, sustainability, and technological innovation reimagine through BioKulture Systems Design that prioritizes self-determination, ethics, ongoing Free, Prior Informed Consent (FPIC), Indigenous Embassy, reciprocal accountability, and responsibility. For Indigenous Peoples, sovereignty is deeply intertwined with the data lifecycle (data maturity)—a relational resource that reflects their [bio]cultural, ecological, and spiritual identities. Indigenous Data Sovereignty (IDSov) and Indigenous Data Governance (IDGov) challenges prevailing data commodification and extraction paradigms in the digital swamp and "open" data paradigms by asserting the right to control, manage, and use data in ways that legitimize millennial-old Indigenous Research and Development (R&D) traditions that have profoundly informed contemporary science and technology and honor Indigenous worldviews/cosmology, affirming legitimacy deeds and titles to its metadata sources. This statement highlights how IDSov and IDGov principles can safeguard knowledge systems, sovereignty, and operationalize biocultural governance, contributing to global Indigenous sustainability goals and targets by 2050. This contribution examines the transformational potential of data legitimacy deeds and titles (i.e., fiduciary jurisprudence), how BioKulture Engineering, shaped by nature-culture agency, can realize social-ecological futures and sovereign bio/data economy participation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Fiducial Markers/supply & distribution, Indigenous Peoples/legislation & jurisprudence, Fiducial Markers/ethics, Indigenous Peoples/history, Fiducial Markers/statistics & numerical data, Fiducial Markers/supply & distribution, Indigenous technology, (EMRIP) Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Operationalizing CARE Principles, Indigenous knowledge, Fiducial Markers, Fiduciary Jurisprudence, Indigenous Peoples Rights to Data, Fiducial Markers/standards, Fiducial Markers/economics, Fiducial Markers/statistics & numerical data, Indigenous Peoples/legislation & jurisprudence, Indigenous Peoples, Indigenous Peoples/genetics, (IDSov) Indigenous Data Sovereignty, Data Deeds and Titles, Bioculture AI, Indigenous Data Kinship

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average