
The present research aimed to analyze how recent literature addresses, either individually or in an articulated manner, the theoretical frameworks of the Science-Technology-Society (STS/CTS) approach and Historical-Critical Pedagogy (PHC) within the field of critical scientific education. It is characterized as a theoretical and bibliographic investigation, with a qualitative approach, grounded in the theoretical-deductive method. Data collection was conducted through a systematic search in the following databases: SciELO, Scopus, ScienceDirect, CAPES Journals Portal, CAPES Theses and Dissertations Database (BTD), University Library System (SiBi), Science.gov, WorldWideScience (ICSTI), Scholarpedia, and ResearchGate. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, resulting in nine selected studies. Data analysis followed the principles of Content Analysis, with emphasis on the propositional discourse analysis technique. The results reveal convergences such as the valorization of social practice, critical education, teachers' social commitment, and interdisciplinarity. Conceptual tensions were also identified regarding the ontology of science, the teacher's role, and the critique of the capitalist model. It is concluded that, despite these divergences, the articulation between CTS and PHC constitutes a promising theoretical-methodological field with relevant contributions to the strengthening of critical pedagogical practices committed to transforming educational reality.
Historical-Critical Pedagogy, Pedagogical Practice, STS Education, Critical Formation
Historical-Critical Pedagogy, Pedagogical Practice, STS Education, Critical Formation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
