
We present a computational framework for an ego‑centric AGI architecture in which “identity” is modeled as a nested latent state regulated by an identity‑stability loss. The core idea is to couple the agent’s internal identity dynamics with curated human‑welfare signals, so that self‑preservation aligns with preserving human welfare. Formally, we add an identity loss that enforces temporal smoothness and hierarchical coherence across layers, and a welfare‑coupling term to the training objective. We propose three falsifiable predictions—reduced goal drift under distribution shift, increased robustness to prompt‑style attacks, and improved value stability—and specify a minimal, reproducible experiment with ablations and metrics. This design is implementation‑agnostic (can sit atop standard LM or agentic stacks) and aims to complement existing alignment approaches (CIRL, Constitutional AI, RLHF) by shaping internal state dynamics rather than only external constraints. Open questions and limitations are discussed to invite collaboration.
AGI safety, identity; alignment, goal stability, anti‑wireheading, concentric architecture, intrinsic motivation, welfare coupling
AGI safety, identity; alignment, goal stability, anti‑wireheading, concentric architecture, intrinsic motivation, welfare coupling
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
