Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Review of the Regulatory Environment Governing Stablecoins in Singapore and the Implications of Contemporary Legislative Evolution in Competing Jurisdiction

Authors: Ramaswamy, M.P;

Review of the Regulatory Environment Governing Stablecoins in Singapore and the Implications of Contemporary Legislative Evolution in Competing Jurisdiction

Abstract

Technological evolution enabling the offering of digital assets, particularly, using crypto technologyand distributed ledger technology, have made various crypto assets viable. However, with the perception ofhigh risks and threats posed by crypto assets, most markets around the world are yet to legalize the circulationof crypto currencies or offering of other digital assets. Even in jurisdictions that have not strictly banned cryptoassets or currencies, relevant regulatory standards to enhance the legal environment governing digital assetsare rare to come. However, with the efforts of pertinent international institutions, regulatory emergence couldbe noticed, especially in prominent financial markets like Singapore, Hong Kong and USA. The pioneeringregulation in this regard are seen first in one low-risk crypto asset offerings namely the stablecoins. The presentpaper aims at assessing the regulatory developments governing stablecoins in Singapore as one of the firstjurisdictions to introduce an exclusive stablecoins regulatory regime and assess its relative strength andpotential limitations from the perspective of stablecoins business operators. The paper also aims to undertakean assessment of contemporary regulatory development in two competing jurisdictions of Hong Kong and USAthat have introduced the latest legislative instruments comprehensively governing stablecoins. Three distinctparts of the paper carryout a close analysis of a selected set of regulatory standards and related developmentsin the three jurisdictions with some relevant references to the international regulatory efforts. The paperconcludes with an analysis of the major findings relating to the regulatory standards in Singapore and certaincomparative regulatory features to derive relevant implications and recommendations.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Crypto and Distributed Ledger Technology, Digital Assets, Stablecoins, Singapore, Comparative Regulation, Hong Kong and USA

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green