Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2025
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2025
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2025
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

CiberIA with AIsecTest and Ψ∑AISysIndex

Authors: Garcia Castillon, Jordi;

CiberIA with AIsecTest and Ψ∑AISysIndex

Abstract

This technical report introduces CiberIA, an innovative system designed to assess the functional security self-perception of artificial intelligences. At its core lies the AIsecTest, a 100-item evaluation instrument inspired by clinical and neuropsychological self-awareness scales, which measures an AI's ability to recognize its own limitations, detect errors, and assess internal vulnerabilities. The system applies a multi-judge scoring methodology, involving six AI models and one human evaluator, and translates the results into the Ψ∑AISysIndex, a standardized introspective maturity index. The report presents the conceptual foundation, system architecture, scoring methodology, and results of empirical simulations on large language models. It also discusses implications for AI auditing, regulatory compliance (such as with the EU AI Act), and the ethical evaluation of autonomous systems, proposing CiberIA as a foundational tool for next-generation AI governance.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green