
This investigation examines the deficiencies in interagency collaboration among the Philippine National Police (PNP), the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD), and barangay units in the management of VAWC cases. The research surveyed 268 frontline personnel directly involved in VAWC casework, employing a quantitative-descriptive design with corroborating qualitative data. The results of this study suggest that all three agencies share common systemic deficiencies, including inefficient communication mechanisms, disjointed referral systems, and inadequate training. The absence of a cohesive operational framework often results in procedural inconsistencies and delays in service delivery, despite each agency fulfilling its mandated responsibilities. The quantitative results indicate that there are no statistically significant differences in the way loopholes are experienced, and a shared perception of collaboration-related deficiencies exists among agencies. Notably, the frequency of encountered vulnerabilities is inversely proportional to the perceived strength of the partnership. These findings suggest that implementing more responsive and effective interventions for VAWC cases may be facilitated by enhancing interagency coordination. The study concludes with a suggestion for a unified interagency plan that prioritizes institutional reforms, centralized data systems, and capacity-building initiatives to address the current operational gaps. In order to safeguard the rights and well-being of women and children who have been affected by violence, as well as to improve service efficacy, is it suggested to improve interagency collaboration amongst. This research provides empirical evidence to support policy enhancement initiatives which can aim of creating a more comprehensive and survivor-centered response system.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
