Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Franco Basaglia e la filosofia nell'epoca del DSM-5

Authors: Di Adamo, Loredana;

Franco Basaglia e la filosofia nell'epoca del DSM-5

Abstract

In a contemporaneity devoted to technicality and the sanitation of need, Franco Basaglia’s work returns to echo the question about the meaning of care. Medicalizing, aseptic and standardized practices have become the norm: for each problem we have identified a diagnostic label and for each disorder a technique to neutralize it. In the centenary of Basaglia’s birth, reflecting on the goodness of our practices becomes important, in the face of looming critical issues in the field of mental health which involve services, people, families and the community in different ways. The question about the possibility of philosophical thinking in the era of DSM-5 was the question that guided my curiosity many years ago and which still today directs my commitment to a change in the culture of care. Starting again from Franco Basaglia is my answer to this question. An answer that draws on an ethical, and not a technical, dimension of treatment, and on what has already been done in psychiatry, showing its effectiveness. Relaunching the Phenomenology and values of Psychiatric Reform [law 180/1978] in the clinic today represents hope for the health sciences, so that they can still be human and kind, and so is guaranteed an investment memory for the future of psychiatry. An important and indispensable commitment, which draws on philosophy, and which brings the clinic closer to life. For a healthcare society that does not entrust the well-being of people and families to a healthcare model but is able to provide an adequate response to every person who asks for something.

Keywords

Human-Centered Care, Phenomenological Psychiatry, Ethics of Care, Medicalization Critique, Deinstitutionalization

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!